Confusing and Conflicting Police Actions
by Kevin Dunn. Written and Posted on May 26, 2017.
Today I watched a TV "news" video out of Phoenix, Arizona concerning a person who apparently impersonated a police officer. This person is reported to have made a traffic stop during nightime hours and robbed the driver of that stopped vehicle. Here is the video.
Police looking for man that impersonated a Phoenix officer recently
Published on May 25, 2017
"Police looking for man that impersonated a Phoenix officer recently and even pulled someone over before robbing them."
The video fails to tell us any information about the vehicle that the "suspect" was driving. We know nothing about the color of the vehicle or the make and model of the vehicle or even why the "victim" thought it was a police vehicle. Did it have overhead emergency lights? Were the emergency lights hidden in the grille or was there some sort of emergency light inside the "suspect" vehicle that was activated so that it could be seen through it's windshield?
What we hear in the "news" report is all about what the "suspect" was or was not wearing at the time that he approached the "victim" after he/she pulled over. In other words, we don't know anything about what made the "victim" think that he/she was being pulled over by the police in the first place.
Are you surprised by this major failure by the "TV News Team" to tell us what matters the most? You shouldn't be surprised if you read my article Arizona is "Dog Training" Drivers.
The "TV News Team" is nothing but a bunch of script readers. Every Hollywood actor is a script reader too, but at least they don't pretend to be saying something factual and true.
ALL TV "news" is about SELLING the script. Look at all of the razzle dazzle that went into the graphics in that "news" segment. If only they would have spent 1/2 that much effort in saying something helpful, but being helpful was not part of the script. If it was part of the script, we would know everything possible about the "suspect" vehicle and why the driver believed it to be a police vehicle in the first place.
Now here is something that is mind boggling. At the 0:42 mark, the reporter starts to tell us that the "victim" was pulled over and robbed by the "suspect". OK? We know nothing about why the "victim" thought that the "suspect" was a police officer, but suddenly at the 1:04 mark, we have the police sergeant telling the viewing audience to ask to see the police ID of any person who is NOW standing at their driver side window, and appears to be a police officer who is not wearing a complete police uniform.
Once a driver has pulled over and once that "officer" has approached the driver, would that "officer" think to himself "oh dear, I can't rob this person now because he/she just asked for my ID"?
When will people understand that the "TV News Team" is NOT trying to HELP any of us?
Here's the thing about "the news". Newspapers, magazines, TV, radio. It doesn't matter what form, ALL of it can be EDITED. That police sergeant might have been extremely intelligent in her presentation when she was interviewed, but AFTER the edit, she sounds like another clueless pawn who has been sacrificed by the non-stop propaganda machine that is called "TV News".
The REALLY important thing is DON'T stop if there is a reasonable suspicion that the person in the "police vehicle" is an imposter. Drive to a crowded and well lighted area if you have doubts about who is in that "police vehicle". If it really is a police officer, you will be safe. You might get a ticket for not stopping right away, but that's better than getting robbed or worse. Tickets can be fought. That is what this "news" segment should have been about. The fact that this "news" segment is NOT about how to REALLY stay SAFE, should be screaming out to everyone that this "news" segment is NOT about helping us.
Now look at this video.
DPS raises $30,000 for Special Olympics Arizona
Published on Apr 24, 2017
The numbers from last week's "BBQ for Champions" are in.
DPS is short for the Arizona Department of Public Safety, which is better known as the Arizona Highway Patrol (my former employer).
Notice at the 1:30 mark, the Director (police chief for the agency) says "as we rebrand the organization..........". What he is referring to is the name change of the department. The Arizona Highway Patrol is now calling itself "Arizona State Troopers". That's just like Trump claiming to be the DICTATOR instead of the President. I reject that name change, but it clearly shows that the Arizona Highway Patrol is becoming a New World Order police agency.
Anyway, the reason that I posted this video is to show you the new unmarked patrol vehicles that the Arizona Highway Patrol has added to it's fleet, starting at the 2:01 mark.
What is going on here?
The first video is about a driver being robbed by someone who appeared to be a cop to the driver and now the Arizona Highway Patrol is intentionally using unmarked vehicles to patrol the highways and stop drivers. We know nothing about the "police vehicle" that was used when the driver was robbed, but we can see that the highway patrol is intentionally using cars that none of us would associate with police vehicles.
Are they intentionally trying to confuse us and cause conflict? My answer is YES.
Here is another issue that will cause confusion.
20080729 SWAT Team honored for raiding wrong house
Published Aug 27, 2008
"Khang fired several shots at the "intruders" who turned out to be members of the Minneapolis Police Department's SWAT team. The officers returned fire. Their protective gear prevented them from being harmed by the bullets.
"No one was hurt in the shootout last Dec. 16 and the Minneapolis Police Chief ordered an internal investigation. The house was left riddled with bullet holes and broken glass. Two days later, Dolan apologized to the family and launched an internal investigation to find out how the SWAT team wound up in an innocent family's house in the middle of the night."
Now look at this video.
Dad speaks out for son charged with shooting cops
Published on Apr 21, 2017
In the first video, the cops get awards for making a HUGE mistake.
In the 2nd video, a young man gets charged with multiple felonies for making a lesser mistake. After all, this young man had good reason to be afraid based on the events he experienced in the past few days. It was a mistake for him to shoot through the door. No doubt about that, but he was defending himself in his own home as he saw things. He was not out and about looking to harm anyone.
The officers in the first video were trained. There were several officers and ALL of them THOUGHT about what they were going to do. Their BEST thinking got them to this point and they ALL agreed to actively and willingly enter someone's home at night with FORCE. They were armed with the intention of using those firearms to shoot anyone who they deemed to be a threat to their safety. They did try to shoot the innocent homeowner, but they failed.
The young man says that he did not try to shoot anyone, but his marksmanship through a closed door was still more accurate than several trained cops who raided the wrong house. He didn't have time to think things through like the cops in the first video. He was inside his own home when he was suddenly faced with a situation that frightened him and he responded. If he would have had as much time to think as the cops in the first video had to think before they forced their way into that innocent man's home, perhaps he never would have shot through the door.
Why did the cops get a "pass" when they really messed up by entering the wrong home?
Why does a scared young man get raked over the coals for trying to defend himself?
Are you confused? You won't be confused once you realize that ALL of the police chiefs and sheriffs are our enemies and that the "legal" system is a complete fraud. From this article
Hey Voters......... Have You Figured It Out Yet?
The US Supreme Court admitted on June 26, 2015 that the US Constitution is gone. It's been gone since 1933, but now Chief Justice Roberts actually said it when the gay marriage ruling came out.
Pay particular attention at the 2:35 mark to the 2:58 mark
"Do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it"
Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage Legal Nationwide
The US Constitution is supposed to be the law of the land. The Supreme Court's only job is to use that Constitution in determining if any law is Constitutional. That's it. Nothing else.
They just told us that the US Constitution was not used in the same sex marriage ruling. They just told everyone that the Constitution is gone. It's been gone since 1933. If people want more detailed info, click the link at the bottom of this short article.
America's Constitutional Dictatorship
Confusing the American People is part of the New World Order plan to destroy America. The police and the courts are neck deep in the conspiracy to destroy us.
More to come.
As always, trust God and trust the King James Bible.